Interpretation of quantum mechanics which denies the collapse of the wavefunction.
The Many Minds Interpretation of quantum mechanics is a fascinating alternative to the Many-Worlds Interpretation, also known as Everettian Quantum Theory. This interpretation attempts to solve the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, a problem that arises when a quantum system is measured, causing its wave function to collapse into a single eigenstate.
The Many Minds Interpretation was first proposed by David Albert and Barry Loewer in 1988. It is a variant of the Everettian Quantum Theory, but instead of proposing the existence of many worlds, it suggests the existence of many minds or mental states for each observer.
In this interpretation, each observer is associated with an infinite number of minds. Each mind observes a definite outcome of a quantum measurement. When a quantum measurement is made, all minds continue to exist but they 'split', with each mind observing a different outcome.
The Many Minds Interpretation attempts to solve the measurement problem by suggesting that all possible outcomes of a quantum measurement are realized in the minds of the observer. This interpretation eliminates the need for wave function collapse, a concept that is considered problematic in other interpretations of quantum mechanics.
In the Many Minds Interpretation, the wave function never collapses. Instead, each mind of the observer perceives the wave function as having collapsed to the particular state that the mind observes.
The concept of minds and mind-splitting is central to the Many Minds Interpretation. Each mind is considered a separate conscious entity that perceives a unique reality. When a quantum measurement is made, the minds 'split', with each mind perceiving a different outcome.
Mind-splitting is not a physical process, but a mental one. It does not imply that the brain or the body of the observer splits. Instead, it suggests that the observer's mental state splits into multiple distinct states, each perceiving a different reality.
The Many Minds Interpretation shares many similarities with the Many-Worlds Interpretation. Both interpretations propose that all possible outcomes of a quantum measurement are realized. However, while the Many-Worlds Interpretation suggests that these outcomes are realized in different worlds, the Many Minds Interpretation proposes that they are realized in different minds of the same observer.
The Many Minds Interpretation, like all interpretations of quantum mechanics, faces several criticisms and challenges. One of the main criticisms is the lack of a clear definition of what constitutes a 'mind'. Critics also question how minds can split and how they can have different perceptions of reality.
Despite these criticisms, the Many Minds Interpretation provides a unique perspective on quantum mechanics and continues to be a topic of active research and discussion in the field of quantum foundations.